Richard Shiff

Richard Shiff is Effie Marie Cain Regents Chair at the University of Texas at Austin, and a Consulting Editor at the Rail.

For those who study the historical fate of Paul Cezanne, the ramifications of his respect for Nicolas Poussin become central.

Nicolas Poussin, Landscape with Ashes of Phocion, 1648. Oil on canvas, 70 ¼ × 45 ⅞ inches. Walker Art Gallery, National Museums Liverpool.

A gallery that hands magnifiers to viewers must be anticipating the question, “What is it?” From a customary viewing distance, the images that Ewan Gibbs presents, composed of marks of graphite and ink as well as pricks of a pin, are easy enough to decipher—as images. They represent views of familiar New York City landmarks, contour maps of Texas, and station codes from Texas Amtrak. 

Ewan Gibbs, Central Park, 2024. Pencil and pinpricks on paper, 4 3/4 x 3 1/2 inches. Courtesy the artist and Lora Reynolds Gallery.

From around 1990, Whitten composed most paintings additively, joining small units of acrylic tile in a mosaic-like manner. In some works, a variable spray or powder of white on a black ground differentiates the elements. Individually, such reflective units evoke galactic space as well as the time-travel that might be required to pass through the inky depths of one tile into the abyss of its digital neighbor. “I am a digital expressionist,” Whitten wrote in 1994. This was expressionism that lacked the usual analog continuity of gesture.

Jack Whitten, Homecoming: For Miles, 1992. Acrylic on canvas, 6 feet 9 ¼ inches × 8 feet 9 ½ inches. Frank and Eliane Demaegd-Breynaert, Belgium. © Jack Whitten Estate. Photo: Peter Cox.

If all our experience and learning, both sensory and conceptual, has brought us (the world) to its present situation, then will learning still more along the same lines lead to a remedy? Or should we learn in a different way, as if occupying a different self?

I responded to Richard Serra’s art from the start—my start with art, not his, for he was a few years older and, I suspect, forever more clued-in to what might be possible as “art.” My immediate appreciation of Richard’s work was due to my generation somehow being primed for it, unconsciously attuned to art that presented viewing as a process rather than as an image.

Portrait of Richard Serra, pencil on paper by Phong H. Bui

A passage from a Judd interview of 1987 explains why he rejected Stella’s practice: “Frank … transforms painting into bas-relief, which is still an old-fashioned approach.… If painting has a totality, and it likely does, it resides in flatness…. As for three-dimensional work, it should be three-dimensional. In other words, you take the two categories and you push them as far as possible. Which leaves Frank in the middle of nowhere.”   

Frank Stella, K.40 Large Version, 2014. Fiberglass on foam core, 194 x 152 x 168 inches. © 2024 Frank Stella / Artists Rights Society (ARS). Photo: Genevieve Hanson.
It’s not unusual for creative artists and scholars to extend their working time as far as humanly possible, attempting to complete projects when faced with a terminal disease or the prospect of cognitive decline. Rather than indulging in pleasurable pastimes that require little mental energy, they engage all the more intensively in applying their professional skills, refined over many years. Productivity increases, sometimes to the neglect of other responsibilities.
Pablo Picasso, Self-Portrait Facing Death, 1972. Graphite and colored pencils on paper, 25 1/2 x 20 inches. Courtesy the Estate of Pablo Picasso and ARS.
Richard Shiff speaks with Scott Rothkopf and Carlos Basulado about their methodology for organizing the exhibition, Jasper Johns: Mind/Mirror, the emotional range of Johns’s work, and how the artist’s personality connects to his work.
Portrait of Jasper Johns, pencil on paper by Phong H. Bui.
We connected via Zoom to discuss Shiff's most recent publication, Sensuous Thoughts: Essays on the Work of Donald Judd (2020).
Portrait of Richard Shiff, pencil on paper by Phong H. Bui.
If we follow the curatorial lead through Lüpertz’s retrospective at the Haus der Kunst in Munich, we witness an artist investigating in still imagery what the masters of 20th century cinema explored in moving pictures. Presenting a deeply researched account, curator Pamela Kort demonstrates the numerous analogies to filmic practice in Lüpertz’s art.
Markus Lüpertz, Träumer, 2014. Mixed media on canvas, 78 3/4 x 63 3/4 inches. Private Collection. © VG Bild-Kunst, Bonn 2019.
When a second observation connects to a first, it alters the sense. Whatever registers in consciousness, registers a difference—not only its own but also a difference in what came before.
Portrait of Richard Shiff, pencil on paper by Phong Bui.
Two years ago, speaking from his studio, Georg Baselitz said that he felt “no more aggression” and had “nothing to prove.”
Georg Baselitz, Schlafzimmer (Bedroom), 1975. Oil and charcoal on canvas, 98 1/2 x 78 3/4 inches. Georg Baselitz Treuhandstiftung.
Jack Whitten, approaching 80, died too young. His work was still developing—rapidly, in fact—and he was generating a whirl of new ideas as if he had nothing old to rely on. This was so, because none of Jack’s older art had aged. His old wasn’t old.
Jack Whitten, Black Monolith, II: Homage To Ralph Ellison The Invisible Man, 1994. Acrylic and mixed media on canvas: molasses, copper, salt, coal ash, chocolate, onion, herbs, rust, eggshell, razor blade, 58 x 52 inches. © Jack Whitten. Courtesy the artist and Hauser & Wirth, NY.
The sociopathic killer Anton Chigurh, a creation of novelist Cormac McCarthy, enjoys using a coin toss to decide the fate of people he encounters.
David Reed, #90, 1975. Oil on canvas. 76 x 56 inches. Sammlung Goetz, Munich. © 2017 David Reed / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York. Photo: Robert McKeever. Courtesy Gagosian.
During recent decades, as Joachim Pissarro observes, theoretical constructs have guided the critical evaluation of visual art and even shaped its base in perceptual experience.

Close

Home