E. Minassian

E. Minassian is a part of the publishing collective Niet!, as well as the blog Les Serpents de la Mer, both engaged in critical social theory. He spent several periods in the West Bank between 2004 and 2023, particularly in refugee camps, running video workshops and carrying out research.

In 2009, I lived for three months in the Tadamon neighborhood, in the suburbs of Damascus. In this suburb, regime control was less visible—a “periphery,” as sociologists call it, always careful to stay on the right side of the line. In 2011, gatherings began to form. 

In the first part of this interview, Emilio Minassian spoke about the integration of Israel/Palestine into global capitalism and the social composition of Palestine. Part two deals with the implications of this social composition for the proletarian and national liberation struggles.

Israeli warplanes bomb a civilian residential building in Gaza in 2021. Photo: Osama Eid.

Insisting that “there is such a thing as social class in Palestine” might seem out of place when Gazans have been drowning under bombs for more than a year. No doubt I would refrain from doing this, or I’d do it in another way, had I been hanging about in Gaza and not in the West Bank. But I don’t insist on class in order to downplay the current massacre, but to combat the idea of a radical otherness, of an exteriority, of what is currently happening in relation to capitalist social relations, here as there.

Erich Habich, A Gaza man working a Singer sewing machine in a backyard business. Ehabich at English Wikipedia, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons.
The “one land, two peoples” analysis of the situation is nonsensical. The land does not belong to the people, anywhere in the world. It belongs to those who own it. This might seem very theoretical, but the mere existence of social relations on the ground shows to whom the idea of two camps belongs, i.e., the ruling class.

Close

Home