Ana V. Diez Roux

Ana V. Diez Roux is Professor of Epidemiology and Director of the Drexel Urban Health Collaborative.

 

It can be argued that the public health implications of the second Trump administration pale in comparison to broader implications for freedom of speech, rule of law, and respect for human rights. But the impacts on public health offer a specific illustration of the ways in which this administration is threatening very basic aspects of our society fundamental to everyone’s health and well-being.

A skeletal figure surveying three doctors around a cauldron, a parody of Macbeth and the three witches; promoting James Morison’s alternative medicines. Lithograph.

Much could be inferred based on the experience of Trump’s first presidency, the ideology reflected in Trump’s campaign (and in Project 2025), and early indications of who his nominees for top government health-related positions might be. But the first few weeks after Trump’s inauguration, marked by multiple presidential executive orders and the actions of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), added a sinister dimension and have created much confusion, chaos, and fear in the public health community about how bad things really could be.

Anti-vaccination league postcards, ca. 1896. Unknown author.
The pandemic has made starkly visible the impact on health of social and racial inequities, as illustrated now by myriads of reports demonstrating striking differences in COVID-19 incidence rates and mortality by social class and race.
One of the most remarkable aspects of the COVID-19 pandemic is the way it has made visible and concrete the links between the social, economic, and political systems we have created for ourselves and our health. These links have been manifested both in the effects of the pandemic itself as well as in the ways we have responded (or failed to respond) to it.

Close

Home