ArtSeen
Art is the Commons
Culture has become a commodity, preserved, protected, professionalized, and compartmentalized by “public” institutions and the private market. Power, established in the profit-driven economy, manipulates value and controls circulation of ideas and innovation. Culture is sold, owned, and safeguarded, as if it could be stolen and protected, rather than shared, changed and built upon collaboratively. How can we begin to experiment with the boundaries created by this hermetically sealed, self-referential system, pushing up against, gently prodding, or kicking through these barriers?
The wealth of all generations, in large overlapping systems, belongs to us all. Art, ideas, culture, and knowledge are collaborative and collective, a generative commons built upon and interacting with all that has come before. The commons traditionally brings to mind a system where a community shares tangible resources. The advantage is that responsibility and care for what is essential is distributed within members of society.
Art is the commons, yet with functions that are less tangible and cannot be enumerated or delineated as clearly as land, water, and air. Reframing our shared culture as a commons is a way to begin the process of negotiating a relationship which has no physical form at all, such as ideas and culture, and a lens for imaging a more equitable and collaborative view of art and artist.
How can we begin to reclaim the cultural commons? It is important to challenge our relationship to and assumptions about art, culture, artists, innovation, and ideas. How much is shaped by the myth of the individual genius, which disproportionately benefits the financial interests of collectors and institutions and not artists or community or public? What would the world look like if art was not considered a luxury item or financial asset to be bought, sold, and speculated on for profit? What if we could freely build upon our cultural capital, unencumbered by copyright or even the idea that we could “steal” someone’s ideas or work? What if we were encouraged to see all creative acts and ideas as belonging to everyone? What if artists created collectively with the assurance that their work was not something to sell or to be cordoned off by a barrier of individual ownership? What have we not even begun to imagine within our current state of confinement within the system?
Contributor
Maria ByckMARIA BYCK is an artist, documentary filmmaker, and member of Making Worlds Commons Coalition and Arts & Labor?both working groups of Occupy Wall Street.
RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

Merril Mushroom's Bar Dykes: Conjuring '50s Lesbian Bar Culture
By Kathleen WarnockJUL-AUG 2019 | Theater
Merril Mushroom came to New York City in the early 60s like many queer people: looking for a home, excitement, a place she could be herself, and artists to hang out with and admire.

Roxane Gay’s Not That Bad: Dispatches from Rape Culture
By Matt GrantMAY 2018 | Books
Not That Bad compiles twenty-nine essays by authors all across the gender and sexuality spectrum who share their own encounters with sexual violence. In almost every one, the writer struggles to come to terms with the fact that what happened to them was, indeed, that bad.

Dreams of National Capital: Market Socialism, Past and Present
By Jamie MerchantJUL-AUG 2018 | Field Notes
The apparition of a general trade war stalks the global economic order. In the United States, it recently manifested itself in the debate over the issue of sanctions leveled against Chinese companies. Bernie Sanders, the unofficial standard bearer of neo-social democracy in the U.S., excoriated the Trump administration for walking back on sanctions against the telecommunications firm ZTE.

The Black Market
By Joshua DanielMAR 2018 | Fiction
JOSHUA DANIEL is a new york-based cartoonist and illustrator. He makes noir comics, political comics, boardgames, and DnD characters. You can also visit his website for commissions and other things, www.thenoirguy.com, and also check out more political comics at thenoirguy.itch.io