ArtSeen
Mike Kelley Green Depths And Los Angeles 1955-1985, Naissance d’une Capitale Artistique

Louvre Museum, Paris, France June 14–Sept. 18, 2006
Centre Georges Pompidou, Paris, France March 8-July 17, 2006
Outré art’s an inside job. Can there still be any doubt? Bad boy/bete noir Mike Kelley is showing in Paris at both the Louvre and the Centre Pompidou simultaneously. A product of Cal Arts, Valencia’s prestigious “post-avant” art program, Kelley now teaches at the Art Center in L.A. While reaping undeniably heavy street cred for the extended summer vacation he took between graduate school and his first teaching job. Even a deafman’s glance at both shows here charts the curve of his decline into respectability.
His Green Depths at the Louvre contains the requisite handful of video panels, deployed in predigested Sensurround displays now necessary for legitimatization by any funded, major cultural institution dosed with plenty of dopey crowd-pleasing appeal. These screens feature woozy zoom-lens “quotes” from a fairly derelict selection of deservedly neglected American historical paintings: bargain basement figures such as Martin Johnson Heade and (never heard of him) Thomas Wilmer Dewing. Is this yet another antic Kelley effort to resurrect unjustly overshadowed art, standing the world on its head in some “transgressive inversion” like his prescient restoration of the already world-famous “Zap” cartoonist R. Crumb? Or his massive photo book “Exquisite Mayhem” slam-packed with costumed Big Time wrestlers, brought into the light at last for kids who don’t dress up on Halloween or even watch TV?
Of Dewing’s “The Recitation” (1891), which portrays a spoken word rehearsal by two women on green fields by the sea, Kelley states in the Louvre’s press release: “If you were to remove the figures you would almost have a Rothko.” Someone’s had too much time to think. X-ray the underpainting of an Andrew Wyeth and you’d get Abstract Expressionism! Shopping wide, might I then “posit retroactively from Twombly” that J. W. Turner’s late unfinished paintings are today complete? Instructively, in our weak-kneed age of (copy cat) “appropriation,” of which this exhibit proves another groaning instance, the single vital piece included in Green Depths is a painting (by Kelley himself!) entitled “The Crotch Shot.” It depicts a detail from John Singleton Copley’s “Watson and the Shark” of an oarsman in a rowboat peering through a standing sailor’s legs during its man overboard melée.
In a return to directness, guts, go-power and a hands-on attack on materials, this picture alone compares favorably with Kelley’s earlier works like “Monkey Island” (1983)—a veritable wall of voodoo in its tomb-sized, psychic box—exhibited contemporaneously as part of the historical overview Los Angeles 1955-1985: Birth of an Artistic Capital at the Pompidou across town. Similarly, the drum, homemade hooting tubes, incunabula and props left lying inert in this survey’s Performance Related Objects (Kelley: 1977-79) prove more evocative than all the technology that I wish were buried in Green Depths.
Mike Kelley’s art shook and staggered us for decades, working in close with its weird science, going at the body like a boxer, getting us where we live. It is strictly his own high standard—the irrational passion and quality of line in drawings like “The Obscure With Its Indeterminate Size” (1984) or his performance “Perspectaphone” (1978), a ritual without myth—that today won’t let him off the hook.
In 1995, Kelley unleashed his “Educational Complex,” which resembled a high school campus compound but instead indexed its psychological binds. Heavily theorized, we were referred necessarily to support texts that merely masked the absence of substance. All I saw was an architectural model: utterly failing to fall under its purportedly regressive sway; I did not recapitulate myself as a homesick wannabe-teen, a 50-year-old fetish fan of Mad Magazine. Perhaps as desperate a ringmaster as is Damien Hirst, himself now fit for the knacker, Kelley, in (2005), then unloaded “Day is Done,” his woe-is-me prom-gone-wrong Disneyfication of Gagosian’s entire Chelsea New York Gallery. A real-life Carrie remake, replete with bad hair, bad skin and badass bands girls don’t wanna dance to. You tell me—is Goth Rock breaking news? Enter Ronald MacDonald into the art historical canon.
If “Day is Done” was a pup tent circus, Green Depths is a tourist trap’s revolving postcard stand.
Contributor
Geoffrey Cruickshank-HagenbuckleGeoffrey Cruickshank-Hagenbuckle is an American poet and art critic. He lives in Paris and New York City.
RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

Mike Kelley: Timeless Painting
By Lyle RexerDEC 19-JAN 20 | ArtSeen
It was upsetting and exhilarating in equal measure to see a selection of those paintings extracted from the detritus of Kelleys sprawling artistic career and made to stand for something important in the cold confines of Hauser & Wirth. Separated from the stuffed animals, videos, sculptures, and architectural models that crowded MoMA PS1 a few years ago, Kelleys paintings become an uncomfortable retrospective, inevitably shadowed by the artists suicide in 2012.
In the Beginning, Sometimes I Left Messages in the Street
By Lisa ChenMAY 2020 | Fiction
Some years ago I ran into Daisy at an opening for a group show on Orchard Street. The theme of the show was Bad Optics and I dont remember much about the artwork except for a wall of small square canvases, each a painting of different yet eerily identical scenes of the backsides of cops as they swarmed someone unseen on the ground.
Canal Street Research Association: Shanzhai Lyric
By Anna HarsanyiFEB 2021 | ArtSeen
In this space just west of Mercer Street, Shanzhai Lyric traces the transitory and ephemeral nature of Canal Street as a site of knockoff production, dislocated trade routes, and gentrificationand the ways in which bootlegging can generate creative disruptions.
inSerial: part fifteen
The Mysteries of Paris
By Eugène Sue, translated from French by Robert Bononno
MAR 2020 | Fiction
Baron de Graün continued: About 18 months ago, a young man by the name of François Germain arrived in Paris from Nantes, where he had been employed by the banking firm of Noël & Company. Based on statements made by the Schoolmaster and several letters found on him, it appears that the scoundrel to whom he had entrusted his son for the sole purpose of corrupting him, so he might one day be of use to his criminal activities, revealed the terrible plot to the young man when he suggested that he assist them in an attempted robbery and forgery at the firm of Noël & Company, where François Germain worked.