More Articles...
Print
a collective free association of "A Proverbial Machine in the Garden"
by David Brooks
The “machine in the garden” is a cultural symbol embodying the tension between the pastoral ideal and the sweeping transformations wrought by industrialization. In his seminal text, The Machine in the Garden: Technology and the Pastoral Ideal in America (1964), cultural historian Leo Marx considers that “nature” is often symbolized by a garden in the American mythology, while an invading machine often stands in for “technology.” This metaphor points back to the industrial era in 19th century America and Europe, but is equally useful in describing the increasingly globalized networks of contemporary capitalism.
The sculptural installation and print edition (pictured here) entitled A Proverbial Machine in the Garden address questions of how we consume and perceive the natural world, while also foreshadowing an entropic post-industrial future, in which the machinery that has shaped our world will finally lose all purpose. To participate in a collective free association that will become part of the project’s archive in the Social Ecology exhibition, please follow the instructions below.
- On the tractor diagram in the newspaper are six lines indicating specific elements of the tractor. This phase of the print project involves an unlimited number of participants (“writers”) choosing words to fill in these 6 blank spaces.
- Below is a list of terms that pertain to the "A Proverbial Machine in the Garden" project. These are words commonly associated with themes of the “pastoral” and the industrial era, including some taken directly from Leo Marx’s text. Each participant will choose any combination of words from this list to fill in the six blank lines on the print.
- Using a red correction marker, participants will free associate, using the six blank lines of the diagram to connect each of their chosen words to the most appropriate tractor part. Each print will thus be labeled with a unique combination of terms, and each print will have a different author. Participants will sign or print their names on the lower right hand corner of the diagram, in the area marked "Writer". Later, I will sign my name where it says "Artist" and the prints will be numbered 1 - ∞ in the space marked "DWG NO."
- Participants will then add their contribution to the archive of prints in the display vitrine at the Social Ecologies exhibition, expanding the collective free association of "A Proverbial Machine in the Garden" over the duration of the exhibition.
- Once the exhibition has concluded all prints will be documented and added to a public online database.
Lexicon:
Abrasive |
Granite |
Reside |
Contributor
David Brooks
RECOMMENDED ARTICLES
Is Democracy Compatible with Capitalism?
Reconstruction in the US, 1863-1877
by Charlie Post
APR 2018 | Field Notes
This year marks the 150th anniversary of the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment, one of the Reconstruction Amendments, to the US Constitution. Addressing citizenship rights and equal protection of the laws, it has been one of the most litigated portions of the Constitution. Field Notes asked historian Charlie Post to respond to this anniversary by drawing some central political lessons from the history of the Amendment’s establishment.
Charles Gaines
by Charles GainesOCT 2018 | Critics Page
Rosalind Krauss has argued that capitalism, not aesthetics, is the prevailing principle behind art.
Gregory Sholette: Delirium and Resistance: Activist Art and the Crisis of Capitalism
by Gretchen CoombsOCT 2017 | Art Books
In her foreword to Delirium and Resistance, art critic and activist Lucy Lippard remarks how social media has flattened affect and effect in recent years, and suggests Sholette’s exposition might just be a necessary antidote to this apathy and paralysis.
THINKING ABOUT COMMUNISM: Ideas and Realities: Comments on Gabriel Kuhn
by Charles ReeveOCT 2018 | Field Notes
The fall of the former Soviet bloc in 1991 left Marxist-Leninist ideologues at a loss. People who had spent years working hard, often with arrogance and self-confidence, to convince us that a “new reading” of Lenin was the necessary path towards revolution found themselves floating over the ruins and finally recycled their avant-gardist savoir-faire into the formation of new systems of concepts, where Empire replaced Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism—in this case, a system which was favorably received in a few academic circles mourning the lost past. More comic, or simply a mark of ideological confusion, is the intellectual seduction accomplished by Stalin freaks such as “le grand Philosophe” Alain Badiou.
RSS
