ArtSeen
What Do We Expect From Art?
“Alternative” and “space” used to be joined at the hip in the context of artist run and other non-commercial venues of the 1970s and ’80s. Conceived as counterpoints both to commercial galleries and to the institutional baggage of established museums, they focused on work that was pushing the envelope. Overtly political gestures intersected with experimental forms that emphasized conceptual approaches as well as a range of non-traditional media. Freedom from commodification was not just a temporary accident of obscurity but a sought-after condition.
Yet one of the operative conditions of “alternative” is constant motion. Idealistic organizations that managed to persevere have become institutions in their own right—often producing interesting programming still, but far less nimble once they become reliant on boards and fundraising drives. Even more significantly, much that previously operated at the margins of the art world has been embraced and absorbed, leaving little that truly resists being sold, collected, or taught in academies.
So what is the function of the alternative sphere? Is it simply the research and development arm of the established art world, a zone of vitality and experimentation where the most successful ventures will eventually wind up being historicized and monetized? It is important to keep asking what we expect from art, since the answers will help us decide whether our aspirations are well served by the remarkably expansive network of institutions and commercial entities devoted to promoting and disseminating contemporary art.
Another possibility is that the category of art should not be treated as infinitely useful or elastic. Seemingly, the label can be claimed for almost any type of gesture, whether object-based or intangible, aesthetic, or political. To a certain extent, calling something art can help facilitate its visibility and distribution. But in the process, ephemeral work has been professionalized and institutional critique has morphed into artists acting as roving consultants. Despite the involvement of many artists, last year’s Occupy movement did not rely on the label of art to describe its spatial, temporal, or visual strategies. Perhaps the vitality of the future will be found in creative interventions that don’t attempt to use the art world, including its margins, as a platform for social change.
Contributor
Martha BuskirkMARTHA BUSKIRK is the author of Creative Enterprise: Contemporary Art between Museum and Marketplace (Continuum, 2012).
RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

An Alternative Canon: Art Dealers Collecting Outsider Art
By Jonathan GoodmanSEPT 2020 | ArtSeen
Organized by art writer and curator Paul Laster, An Alternative Canon: Art Dealers Collecting Outsider Art presents nearly 75 artworks collected by some 30 dealers. The range of the works, shown salon-style in Edlins space near the New Museum, is remarkable.

Christopher Wilmarth: Sculpture and Drawings from the 1970s
By Jan AvgikosAPRIL 2020 | ArtSeen
A new exhibition at Craig F. Starr Gallery presents a rare opportunity to revisit Christopher Wilmarth's serene glass and steel sculptures of the 1970s. No drama, no mess, no rough edges, nothing but the Apollonian perfection of flawless, hydrofluoric acid-etched translucent glass surfaces that attract and hold the light, reflecting in their layered depths tonal ranges from frosty white to pure aqua.
Artists Space
By Nancy PrincenthalJUL-AUG 2020 | ArTonic
Shocking but true: Artists Space, essential model for a generation of feisty, funky, youth-driven nonprofits, is nearly half a century old. More surprising still, initially it depended entirely on government support, at a time when both the governor of New York (Nelson Rockefeller) and the US president (Richard Nixon, newly re-elected) were Republicans. Promising to make up for a dearth of opportunity for young artists, Artists Spaces founders rounded some up and offered them the chance to call the shots, all on the states dime.
Nancy Princenthals Unspeakable Acts: Women, Art, and Sexual Violence in the 1970s
By Elene PasuriMAR 2020 | Art Books
The 1970s in America was a decisive moment for public dialogue on sexual abuse and it acted as a turning point in gender politics after suffragette feminism, when the pains of abused women were spoken for the first time together with artists. Princenthal explores the phenomenology of precisely these acts of speech: their unspeakability, their first articulations, and their transformation into language.