ArtSeen
Make Room!
One of my big complaints about art magazines has a simple solution.
There’s something they all get backward. When young writers start out, they are usually given assignments on the smallest possible scale, and then gradually, they work their way up to bigger things. This sounds reasonable, but it’s really self-defeating. Take Artforum, for example, where I write and where I do some part-time editing. Typically, we will try a new writer out on the website, artforum.com, where they will write “Critic’s Picks,” brief review-like blurbs of about 300 words. Eventually, they may graduate to the print magazine, where they can stretch with exhibition reviews that are typically about 550-600 words, and then even a longer “focus review” of a major exhibition that’s given a whole page or even two in the magazine. Only a few reach the pinnacle of being allowed to write a feature article. The other art magazines all bring their writers along in a similar manner, as far as I can see. But really this doesn’t make sense. Why? Because in order to write a short piece that has any critical depth, you need to pack a tremendous quantum of implication and inference into it. You need to know a lot more than you’re explicitly saying, and also to have sufficient writerly skill to make sure your readers are catching the drift of what you’re not explicitly saying. In other words, the brief review is like an iceberg—almost entirely below the surface. And an inexperienced writer is likely to crash into that iceberg. But unlike the survivors of the Titanic, he or she may be entirely unaware of the disaster. Far better would be to have new writers produce long essays in which they’d have to make explicit all that they know (and don’t know) about their subjects. Having done that for a while, they’d then be in a better position to master the art of insinuation that is essential to writing brief reviews that have substance. I hear a voice saying that there’s no room for all these long articles—who’d have the space to publish them? But in cyberspace, there’s room for everything. No, if my proposal has a problem, it’s about time, not space: Who has time to edit all those long essays? Okay, so maybe the solution is not so simple after all.
Contributor
Barry SchwabskyBARRY SCHWABSKY is art critic for the Nation and co-editor of international reviews for Artforum.
RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

Interiors: hello from the living room
By Alfred Mac AdamNOV 2020 | ArtSeen
The COVID epidemic has made us acutely aware of interior spaces and their metamorphosis from living space into working and recreational spaces. But this fascinating show also reminds us that these multi-use spaces are saturated with sin.
The Twofold Room
By Marie-Michelle DeschampsMAY 2020 | Critics Page
Deschamps’s interest in the losses and gains through the process of translation illustrated a mode of construction based on altered meanings. Just like a foreign language, the hotel is an abstract location that, through a visual and literary discovery process, becomes a familiar one.
Joan Snyder: The Summer Becomes a Room
By William CorwinOCT 2020 | ArtSeen
Snyder wraps this body of work in an overwhelming sense of acceptance and gratitude for the cycles of nature: the seasons, life and death, day and night, morning and dusk. Overall this seems a positive reckoning; her palette is bright and harmonious, and its hard not to get a boost from looking at it.
Dancing Paula Abdul in my Living Room
By Rennie McDougallMAY 2020 | Dance
Somehow Abdul, on the stage of the Shrine Auditorium in 1990, makes it look as if her dance couldn’t exist with any less space, but replicating (to the best of my ability) her dance in close quarters is a reminder of how dancers can expand the most confined of spaces. Abdul only needed a bathroom and half a mirror.