Dance
BILL T. JONES: Serenade/The Proposition
The post-performance discussion of Serenade/The Proposition nervously circled around the question of how one can (and even whether one should) make dance about history. This piece, commissioned by the Joyce for its 25th anniversary (coincidentally also the Bill T. Jones/Arnie Zane Dance Company’s 25th anniversary) works as a kind of sketchbook for the more extravagant sister piece, Fondly Do We Hope, Fervently Do We Pray, commissioned by the Ravinia Festival for the 200th anniversary of Abraham Lincoln’s birth, which premiered in September. In receiving the Ravinia commission three years ago, Jones decided to invest all of the company’s present energies on the topic, and assigned reading and documentaries not only to himself and his Artistic Director, but also to his dancers and composers. Their in-studio discussions about Lincoln, the Civil War, history, and contemporary race relations were recorded and sampled for inclusion in Serenade’s soundtrack.

Jones is a heady choreographer, whose work has always been informed—if not fully driven—by his potent intellect. It’s unsurprising that an audience might find this kind of work destabilizing; in Serenade, for example, the dancers share the stage with vocalist Lisa Komara and narrator Jamyl Dobson. It is rare for a reviewer to tip her cards, but I will divulge this key fact: the press kit for Serenade/The Proposition included a complete script of the piece’s textual soundtrack—six pages of small-print. The work is driven by text—a text the Company considers so vital that they have not only used it to generate movement, not only invited an actor to share the stage as he delivers it, but have offered it as a kind of libretto for any journalist hoping to make sense of the piece.
And one might want help making sense of the piece, for, in true Bill T. fashion, it is a highly post-modern work. If we cling too tightly to any one sentence or silhouette, our desire for linear narration will be frustrated; instead we must balance attention and intuition, slipping facilely from suggestion to suggestion as the text and movement build a proposition from broken parts. While three dancers scramble (with the pointed buffoonery of political cartoons) and freeze into tableaus (with the neoclassical gravitas appropriate to the backside of the dollar bill), Dobson narrates, with the poise and measure likely learned from Jones’s own voice, “It is something. It is something of a feat. It is something of a feat to ride two horses. It is something of a feat to ride two horses going the same way. It is something of a feat to ride two horses going the same way and at the same pace. . . but still a greater feat when they are going in opposite directions. With malice. With malice toward none. . .”
Dance about history is actually less outrageous than it sounds. Good art, like history, offers a lot of data, but it is all colored by performative subjectivity. Movement on one dancer will be different on another dancer, in the way that one soldier’s recollection of a battle will be different than another’s. In one section of Serenade, two dancers run out from stage right and begin an across-the-floor section of choreography. As they reach halfway to the stage’s midpoint, another two dancers run out, tag them, and pick up the phrase where the first two dancers have now left it, running off stage right. The new pair continues the phrase, moving now to the stage’s center, when a third pair runs out, tags them, and takes over the movement, recapitulating the last arabesque or turn in their own way. This pattern repeats until finding resolution with all dancers back onstage.
This kind of programmatic choreography, creating movement by strategy as much as by expression, allows Jones to address history’s great gray area; rather than making an ideological argument (he is often referred to as a political artist), he makes a thoughtful proposition. Thus, the audience is required to do as much interpretive work as the artists; there is no contention to passively absorb, or against which to react. Just as the dancers’ deconstructed period clothing, assembled from bits and pieces of other shows’ costumes, missing sleeves, and “finished” in places with belts of red tape (a pun not unintended, knowing Jones) convey by inference rather than statement. The constantly made and unmade movement (two groups of dancers entering the stage from two sides, lining up in the center, and retrograding back) tests the text’s various suggestions: “It couldbe said that this history is a person born in 1952.” “It could be said that this history is somebody born in 1981, standing on a beach. . .” “It couldbe said that this history is a person, a woman.” All of this could be said, and in fact it is, but this quality of the serenade (which pleases and maybe, through repetition, even lulls us into a less conscious space) and the proposition (which suggests without committing) leaves open the possibility for additional alternatives. If this piece is even about the “four-score” bearded President, it reveals the triteness of that biopic question “who was Abraham Lincoln?” For no one is anyone in a vacuum, free from the vying voices of a community.
Contributor
Dalia RatnikasDALIA RATNIKAS is a sometimes-dancer sometimes-writer who enjoys playing with her toes and twisting her body like a pretzel. You can also find her at dahlhaus.
RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

BILL SHANNON with Nicole Loeffler-Gladstone
NOV 2020 | Dance
Experimental artist Bill Shannon is the subject of CRUTCH, a new documentary chronicling 20 years of his career as a street performer, skater, b-boy, and more. Shannon speaks with Nicole Loeffler-Gladstone about the documentary process, his performance strategies, and representations of physical disability.

Dance in the Making
By Anna Yudina , Diana Vishneva, and Olivier BerggruenJUL-AUG 2020 | Critics Page
This conversation between Diana Vishneva, Anna Yudina, and Olivier Berggruen explores the evolution of dance, seen from the perspective of an art form in the making, to use William Forsythes memorable formulation.
The Grand Union: Accidental Anarchists of Downtown Dance
By Aileen DowlingSEPT 2020 | Dance
In what is held to be Baness definitive text on postmodern dance, Grand Union serves as almost a coda to a story in which Judson is the protagonist. However, in Wendy Perrons new book The Grand Union: Accidental Anarchists of Downtown Dance, 1970-1976, the group gets their moment after nearly 50 years.
The Bon Iver Race Dance, Reviewed
By Adlan JacksonJUL-AUG 2020 | Dance
Bon Iver began collaborating with Minnesota's TU Dance, which was cofounded by Toni Pierce-Sands and Uri Sands, both Black veterans of Alvin Aileys American Dance Theater, to present Come Through, a contemporary dance performancemixing modern dance, hip hop, and ballet among other movement stylesalongside a live Bon Iver set. With Come Through, Vernon chooses to engage directly, for the first time in his career and with unfortunately haphazard treatment, with images and media like a hoodie superimposed over the word "breathe," and audio from a speech by Viola Davis about Jim Crow racism given at the Womens March.