Express
Dershowitz at War: The Case Against Israel’s Enemies
Alan Dershowitz
The Case Against Israel’s Enemies: Exposing Jimmy Carter and Others Who Stand In The Way of Peace
(Wiley, 2008)
In an attempt to rectify every factual wrong committed against the state of Israel, Alan Dershowitz has effectively argued himself into irrelevancy. The author of The Case For Israel has returned to battle for the Middle East with The Case Against Israel’s Enemies, a chapter by chapter response to Israel’s various ill-wishers.
Among the chosen are Jimmy Carter, the political scientists John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt, the hard left and right, and suicide bombers—a disparate group to be sure. The problem is not that Dershowitz is entirely wrong: Jimmy Carter’s relationship to Israel offends many people and few find suicide bombers admirable. The problem is that Dershowitz jumps into the conversation with such ferocity that he ends up sounding like the most unreliable voice of all.
“I have challenged anyone who claims that mere criticism of Israel is often labeled anti-Semitisim to document that serious charge by providing actual quotations,” Dershowitz writes in the introduction. “I am talking about mainstream supporters of Israel, who, it is claimed, have often equated mere criticism of Israel with anti-Semitism.” Though allegedly writing to clarify that he and his compatriots do not believe that anti-Israel sentiment tends to be anti-Semitic, Dershowitz makes arguments time and again that sound quite a bit like cries of anti-Semitism. In the chapter on Mearsheimer and Walt’s screed against the “Israel Lobby,” Dershowitz writes, “American Jews and their friends are not only disloyal, Mearsheimer and Walt suggest, but dangerous to the United States.” Dershowitz then draws a parallel between this charge and the reasoning behind Pharoah’s instruction to the Egyptian people to enslave the Israelites. Though he explicitly denies that he is calling Mearsheimer and Walt anti-Semitic, it is difficult to interpret this comparison in any other way.
From an aesthetic standpoint, The Case Against Israel’s Enemies is nearly unbearable. Dershowitz is a lawyer and the book reads like a legal text. Each chapter is a painstakingly thorough deconstruction of every lie ever lodged against Israel—making it a well researched but unpleasant read, to say the least. In an attempt to moderate his tone, Dershowitz frequently cedes arguments to people that he disagrees with to show that he is open to other ideas, and then proceeds to rail on and on about the same point. His voice is measured, but the rage is palpable.
At this point in history, very little is clear about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, save for the fact that the only solution, if there is one, will be one that is both nuanced and complex. While Dershowitz is correct that many of Israel’s enemies are doing nothing to ameliorate the situation, Dershowitz himself could do his side a favor and introduce a more balanced perspective of his own.
RECOMMENDED ARTICLES
Repeating Israel
By Oded NirMAR 2019 | Field Notes
Many years have passed since Israel was earnestly held up as "a light unto the nations," whether in a religious or more secular-utopian sense. This seems to be changing in the last few years, but with a horrific ironic twist.
The Case for Telematics
By Jared McNeillJUL-AUG 2020 | Theater
In recent months, as coronavirus closures and quarantine measures began to hint at more than a few empty rows on the calendar, performers and venues rallied around the internet, not just as a crescent means of distribution, but as a new stage for which unique performances are uniquely conceived.
“Liberalization” and the Search for Radical Change in Israel
By Oded NirDEC 19-JAN 20 | Field Notes
2019 has been a very dramatic year in Israeli politics. A political stalemate resulted in the government’s collapse, followed by two consecutive elections due to the failure of Benjamin Netanyahu, usually considered a political miracle worker, to put together a new governing coalition. That in itself should have had the Israeli left looking for a way to reinvent itself, to take advantage of the political crisis. No such luck.
The Case for Impure Vision
By Antonio DamasioJUL-AUG 2020 | Critics Page
It is well known that in the wake of the Romantic era, Cézanne and a host of other artists dreamed of restoring a sense of innocence and purity to our senses—the naiveté of the artist and the innocence of the viewer. Is there such a thing as pure vision? When we are confronted with a painting, is it possible for us to see the object in pure visual terms without being influenced by a host of factors such as one’s prior history of seeing art or one’s acquaintance with art history?
