Editor's Message
A Real Legacy
Many have questioned how our current president, the lamest of ducks, will motivate himself for the nearly two years still left in his second term. A president at this stage ordinarily would be trying to set his party up for succession. But the Republicans’ leading candidates for 2008 have been conspicuously trying to distance themselves from the various messes their leader has created over the past six years. And so the best that George W. Bush can do at this stage, the experts say, is try to shape his “legacy.” For anyone who hasn’t been asleep over the last few years, however, that legacy is already clear: the Bush administration will best be remembered for its destruction of two of the world’s great cities, Baghdad and New Orleans.
Neither city needs to be in ruins, of course. Ignoring repeated warnings of post-Hussein chaos from insiders including Brent Scowcroft, Bush I’s national security adviser, and his own State Department’s “Future of Iraq” project (established in 2002), Bush II plowed forward with his reckless, unnecessary invasion. With the Green Zone now a protected fortress surrounded by war zones and rubble, Baghdad is a new vision of urban planning more chilling than even Mike Davis could ever imagine. In New Orleans, the warnings of impending danger similarly went unheeded. FEMA had stated in 2001 that a hurricane striking the city was one of the top three potential natural disasters waiting to happen, yet in 2004 Bush cut funding requested by the Army Corps of Engineers for the area’s flood control project. Why? To pay for the war in Iraq. As for why he fiddled despite the dire warnings he received in the days leading up to Katrina, that’s a matter for the “Decider” to take up with his maker.
Now is not the time simply to score easy political points by pointing to the Bush administration’s almost criminal negligence. Yet one fears that empty rhetoric about both New Orleans and Iraq is all that the Democrats will offer. That Bush neglected to mention New Orleans in his State of the Union speech is indeed a telling sign of his priorities, as the Democrats have consistently reminded us. But what, exactly, is the Democrats’ plan to rebuild the city? And what about the reconstruction of Baghdad? We do indeed owe it to the people of Iraq (and the rest of the world) to help restore the cradle of civilization. As the war turns four this month, the horrendous legacy of the current administration is already upon us—and will be for several generations to come.
—T. Hamm
RECOMMENDED ARTICLES
Thief of Baghdad: Arabs in World Cinema
By Giovanni VimercatiJUNE 2019 | ArtSeen
When Hollywood recently lined Rami Malek up as the next Bond villain, following his Oscar win, the Lebanese-Iraqi satirist Karl Sharro ironically saluted the event on Twitter, noting that this is the film industrys highest honor for an actor of Middle Eastern origin: cast[ing] them as a Bond villain.

Susan Bee: Anywhere Out of the World: New Paintings, 2017–2020
By Yínká ElújọbaNOV 2020 | ArtSeen
Susan Bee is creating new mythologies to help grapple with a collapsing universe. In Anywhere Out of the World she embraces archetypes and iconic images to reinterpret societal and personal struggles.
Rumaan Alam’s Leave the World Behind
By Joseph PeschelNOV 2020 | Books
Rumaan Alam, a Brooklynite himself, begins his third novel, Leave the World Behind (2020), as if it were a domestic comedy of manners about a Brooklyn family on vacation in Long Island. Alam transforms the story, with its serious and witty commentary on social class and race relations, into a psychological thrillera dystopian tale about the end of the world.
Our World is Burning
By Olivia GilmoreSEPT 2020 | ArtSeen
Over 30 artists focus their attention on human crises in the Arab world and the global ecological emergency at large, while the exhibition itself sparks outrage for its partnership with the Qatari-state-run MATHAF: the Arab Museum of Modern Art.