Local
An Open Letter On Atlantic Center (August, 1996)
To: Mr. Bruce Ratner, Forest City Ratner From: Reverend Dennis A. Dillon, Brooklyn Christian Center
As you are already aware, the Downtown Brooklyn community is very uncomfortable with your current development of the Atlantic Center because of the level of economic inequity that this project represents. This is exacerbated by your own—as well as your company’s—overt defiance and blatant disregard for the people and small businesses in the community.
You and your political cronies continue to take the black community for a ride—down a dead end street. The residents of Fort Greene are still waiting to see how MetroTech benefits them. And with more than 800 of the over 1,000 jobs promised yet to be fulfilled, there are questions as to whether or not there ever was a sincere desire to fulfill the promises made to the community.
WHERE IS THE CONSCIENCE? Where is the spirit of fairness and the desire for economic justice? Where is the love for community and the wisdom of market maintenance and corporation-community partnership?
There is a pressing problem that needs immediate attention: it is a documented fact that small businesses suffer and are pushed out when mega-shopping centers come into a community such as Downtown Brooklyn. The surrounding shops will lose business to the Atlantic Center Mall to the degree that many of them will close their doors within the first year of your operation. And with so few black businesses in our community already, most struggling to survive, they will become the casualties unless a concentrated effort is put forth to upgrade their business district, which is on all four sides of your mall. As we both know, the city gave you the land to build the mall, as well as $12.5 million for infrastructure work, and a 23-year tax abatement grant, HUD gave you $8 million, and much of the rest of the monies used for development came from sources that utilized taxpayers’ monies or dollars on deposit in New York City banks from black depositors. This means that you took our money to build this mall on our land so that you can lure our consumers to spend more of their money, which will leave our community at the end of the business day.
Reprinted by permission of Reverend Dennis A. Dillon.
Contributor
Reverend Dennis Dillon
RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

Art Project Summary: Holding Ice
By Zak HajjaouiJUNE 2019 | Critics Page
Innu people have always been involved in fighting to protect the land, and this project was a way for me to showcase the beauty the land has.

Celebrating 25 Years of Project 59: Irina Danilova
By Peter MaloneMAR 2020 | ArtSeen
Celebrating 25 Years of Project 59, is a retrospective of Irina Danilovas longitudinal commitment to a multidisciplinary art that employs a strangers instinct for the unnoticed. Applying methodologies cobbled from science and art, but independent of eithers restricting imperatives, Danilova delves into the ordinary and the incidental to create a parallel narrative of her unusually busy life.
Silky Shoemaker: Billboard Project
By Ksenia SobolevaOCT 2020 | ArtSeen
If art is to play a role in political change, the first step is to get it out of the galleries and into the streets. Silky Shoemakers Billboard Project, a series of four graphically striking anti-Trump billboards installed in rural Pennsylvania, is one example.
Kent Monkman: mistikôsiwak (Wooden Boat People)
By Ann C. CollinsFEB 2020 | ArtSeen
It may be that history, as Winston Churchill said, is written by the victors, but a deep satisfaction can be had for those who redraft it. Cree artist Kent Monkman does just that for the Metropolitan Museum of Arts inaugural Great Hall Commission. Monkman reverses the European gaze, presenting Indigenous people as heroes who welcome and rescue invading newcomers.