ArtSeen
Glen Goldberg and Richard Van Buren
SideShow Gallery
April 2004
Glen Goldberg, “Wish” (2004) at Sideshow Gallery.The new installation of the painter Glen Goldberg and the sculptor Richard Van Buren is so harmonious a collaboration that their distinct styles and mediums hardly seem to matter. While Goldberg’s paintings allude to the ephemeral lightness of objecthood, Van Buren’s sculptures turn actual objects into a delicate balance of weight and weightlessness. While one meditates on the cosmic beauty of light and air, the other celebrates the sensual elements of earth and water.
Glen Goldberg is, I think, making his best paintings in years. Unlike his early works, which display impeccable graphic intelligence infused with a minimal deployment of form and controlled tonality, recent paintings like "Wish" embody more substantial extrapolation of form and content. With multitudes of various sized dots evolving outward from a central, concentric spin, they burst into robust petals and surrounding birds in flight. In the smaller canvases, which at times rely on hierarchical figure/ground relationships, there are also abstractions with mandala-like constructs painted in bold clarion colors that float indeterminately in space. In the abstractions I find an inherent order that is ornamentally infinite and permeated by a genuine monastic quietism. They are birth motifs which try to resist troubled symbolism and the wilderness of nature.
Richard Van Buren is a sculptor of extravagant sensuality. He seems to reference geology and marine biology, but these are only a pretext for the substratum of vigor poised between improvisation and kinetic energy. A series of pieces, including "Kowloon" and "Eagle and Clam," stretch across the gallery, projecting out from and suspended on the wall; together they constitute a repertoire of forms that gravitate around objects rather than representing them. For the medium of thermoplastic that becomes malleable in heat and solidified in cold, one detects Van Buren’s extending heads as a conduit for the lava flows of his process. And in spite of their sheer Baroque pleasure, which tends to rise in swift, upward movement, they are fierce, congested and heavy. Yet at the same time their tensile force is autonomous and regenerative.
Goldberg and Van Buren are both artists who are constantly and restlessly searching in ways which are not easily categorizable. Having had already enjoyed considerable recognition a decade or two ago, the current exhibit is a testament of renewed spirit in flux, capable of transcending the sublime into the burning exterior from above and below.
RECOMMENDED ARTICLES
Printed Matter
By Megan N. LibertyMAR 2020 | ArTonic
Printed Matter has something of a legendary origin story, equal parts oral history, hearsay, and gossip, passed down through the decades in letters, postcards, photographs, and artist accounts. The exact series of events remains a bit murky—nearly all the early participants claim status as an originator.
Why Does Class Matter?
By Peter St. ClairJUNE 2018 | Field Notes
Does class matter? Steve Fraser answers with a “Duh” in the introduction to his new book, Class Matters: The Strange Career of an American Delusion.
Alberto Giacometti, Herbert Matter, Matthew Monahan, Jonathan Silver
By Jonathan GoodmanMAR 2020 | ArtSeen
Put together by long-standing gallerist Nicole Klagsbrun, whose project space in Chelsea perfectly holds the exhibition’s efforts, the show communicates a shared valuation of figurative art, as well as attempts to make it new. The artists involved—ranging from Giacometti, Matter (Giacometti's brilliant photographer), and more contemporary artists such as the late Jonathan Silver, and Matthew Monahan )based in Los Angeles, but educated here at Cooper Union)—work off of modernism but interpret in their own fashion.
Collaboration in Printmaking: An Influence on Creative Thinking
By Bill GoldstonDEC 19-JAN 20 | Editor's Message
I have often wondered how artists feel about working in printmaking. Does it influence their creative thinking in their primary medium? Do they enjoy working with another person to make their images? Are they excited about the act of printmaking or is it just another source of their livelihood? I have asked several to express their opinions and hope you find their responses informative.
