ArtSeen
JOE AMRHEIN at Roebling Hall
“…a condition of reinterpreting the misinterpreted….tightly choreographed visions of randomness….an exaggerated rhetorical tone bordering on hyperbole…a mad cow in a glass language menagerie…”

Writing about Joe Amrhein’s show at Roebling Hall is somewhat of a paradox come full circle: writing about art that is composed of writing about art; visual signs constructed entirely from linguistic signs painted on glass or vellum. The mirror is an important metaphor for Amrhein. The first piece we encounter upon entering the gallery, which reads “Too Abstract to Refer to a Particular Source,” is titled “Source.” Thus, we begin at the source (“Source” reflects source). “Source” becomes an intimation or key to the rest of the work in the show, which renders as abstract the poetic absurdity of descriptive art rhetoric.
According to the gallery press release, Amrhein takes as the source for his work a quote from Robert Smithson—“one must remember that writing on art replaces presence by absence by substituting the abstraction of language for the real thing.” But what became the work of art for Smithson was, after all, not the thing itself, but the documentation of the thing in writing or photographs and the mythologies these images created. Indeed, the next two pieces, “Lean-To” and “Insite” owe something to Smithson’s site and nonsite work. What comes to mind, of course, are works like “Asphalt Rundown,” “Glue Pour,” and particularly “Map of Glass,” which is described in Smithson’s essay “Incidents of Mirror Travel in the Yucatan.” Unlike Smithson’s work, Amrhein’s glass disaster, “Insite,” does not correspond to or mirror a physical site but a linguistic concept. It implies the other spelling of the word (another mirroring), that of insight as site, and the mapping of an architecture of apprehension.
Next there is the physical mirroring of “Post-Sputnik” and “Sublime in Reverse,” horizontal columns of ascending and descending text that face each other on opposing walls. Taken from commercial art journals like Art in America, the out-of-context text becomes humorous and transparent, revealing an underlying awkward pretension similar to the effect of watching TV with the sound turned off. Finally, “Rationalized” is yet another form of mirroring. Using light to reflect the shadows of words that are painted on glass shelves, “Rationalized” suggests the difficulty of pure seeing. Like the apparitions from Plato’s cave, we only see the shadows of the words, not the “actual” words which are, as well, specters of artspeak.
Roebling Hall, March 17 – April 10
RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

Visions of Brazil
By Madeline Murphy TurnerJUNE 2019 | ArtSeen
Visions of Brazil is an ambitious exhibition that seeks to locate itself within a contemporary discourse on the construction of Brazilian Modernism. Curated by Sofia Gotti for Blum & Poes New York gallery, the exhibition begins with historian Walter Mignolos assertion that coloniality is the darker side of modernity.

Barbara Takenaga and Patricio Guzmán: telescopes and other visions
By Joan WaltemathFEB 2019 | 1 by 1
The buzz about Barbara Takenaga’s recent show, Outset at DC Moore Gallery, had already reached me by the time I got back from my summer on the Great Plains and was standing in front of her lush new paintings.
Quarantine Hall
By George GrellaAPRIL 2020 | Music
The playing was agile, sensitive, transparent. The musicians were completely open to the experience, sincere, eschewing all gesture and affect. There was an ongoing feeling that every line and phrase was part of a seminar, relaxed but with focused energy, every word not only spoken with meaning but placed in the most perfect grammatical and syntactical structure.
No Condition Is Permanent
By Lisa CooleyFEB 2019 | Critics Page
I had specific, personal reasons for closing my gallery, but I also I saw ominous, unavoidable changes in the art market which are analogous to changes in the broader economy.